The Adamski Flying Saucers are REAL!
Used with Permission of the Copyright holders (2001-08-05) -
G.A.F. International/Adamski Foundation
[firstname.lastname@example.org] P.O.1722 Vista, CA 92085 U.S.A.
head of G.A.F. International/Adamski Foundation
P.O.1722 Vista, CA 92085 U.S.A. answer some questions
Q: I would like to know when and how you got involved with the
Adamski Foundation, was it before or after you had seen a flying saucer?
A: My parents - Born in Germany - witnessed both Saucer and Cigar shaped UFO's
during the war years and my father already tracked such worldwide sightings on a large
planetary map. In 1960 we immigrated to the United States and again witnessed several
sightings during our travels.
One such dramatic sighting was in the spring of
1963 - a Bell shaped Saucer hovering clearly visible between one and two thousand feet
directly overhead in Downtown Washington D.C. More than 30 other witness were present
including a newspaper reporter who published the account the next day in the
"Washington Daily News." [original article
is in our archives]
Upon seeing this type of
craft so close, my father researched and found the exact duplicate photographed by
This lead to contact and eventual direct association
with George until his death in two years later in 1965. During this time we had the
honor of shared experiences and sightings while in his company.
Adamski's passing, we have been involved in the Foundation. In the mid 1970's, my
father shared directorship with Mrs. Alice Wells - a long time associate and also
witness the the Desert Center meeting of 1952. He served as sole Director after Mrs.
Wells passing in the early 1980's and upon my fathers passing in 1991, my mother and I
- along with numerous dedicated volunteers, continue this work and now jointly
administer the Foundation. Therefore one could say, I have been immersed in this field
my entire life.
Q: Have you ever seen a "Venusian Saucer" if so when and where? Was you alone?
Are you a relative to Fred Steckling?
the author of "We Discovered Alien Bases On the Moon"
A: Yes, several times, in several locations. Typically in the company of others
but sometimes alone and occasionally while piloting aircraft as well. I am
Fred Steckling's son. I assisted my
father on the original text of "Alien Bases on the Moon, and since his passing in
1991, by request, I have added several new chapters to the newer edition now
Alien Bases on the Moon II"
Q: Do you know if Fred Steckling
has been investigating Russian Luna Data?
A: Over more than 30 years
dedicated to this subject My father talked and associated with innumerable people from
all professions and backgrounds. During those many years, He was invited to interact
with 22 scientists at NASA's Goddard Space flight center, where he presented Adamski
films and materials, including to Col. Freeman and his staff at the Pentagon.
He did the same by invitation from Lord Clancarty before a select committee of the
House of Lords, and in many other countries on television and radio.....
During our last European trip together in 1989, he spoke directly to a group of former
Soviet Scientists about this and other related subjects.
Q: I read in William L. Brian's Moongate about the unexpected pull of Moons at
Apollo 11 - 43,495 miles. I wondering if Fred have tried to obtain Russian satellite
data from their Lunarprogram?
A: 1. This was not really unexpected for this also coincides with Werner Von
Braun's report in his book of the exact same distance, so those on the Apollo project
were aware of it....
(History of Rocketry & Space Travel by
Wernher von Braun and Frederick I. Ordway III, 1969 Editation). According to
Time Magazine July 25, 1969 "At a point 43,495 miles from the moon, lunar
gravity exerted a force equal (the neutral point) to the gravity of the earth, then
some 200,000 miles distant."This means that the moons gravity is around 64% of the
earth, not the 16% mentioned earlier (That's why the Swedish National Encyclopedia
never mention the moon's gravity!) - Hermes
2. Discretion often opens doors...officially - no...
Q: Has he verified the famous 69-HC-431 photo of the Moon?
This photo that show the atmosphere of the moon as a thin blue band
appeared first in the 1971 editation of
Encyclopedia of Discovery and Exploration, volume 17, page 13, chapter
The Moon and Beyond by Fred Apple.
A: I believe the lunar photos stand strongly for themselves...such were just a
fraction of what we found and made available, and a fraction still of what is yet to
be researched and discovered. The ones we originally ordered and purchased from NASA
remain in our vaulted archives...
Q: Do you know if it possible to obtain NASA photos of the Moon through the
World Wide Web? I would like to put up a copy of the blow up photo Lunar Orbiter V No.
67-H-1135 at my website found on page 39 "We Dicovered Alien Bases On the Moon" Can I
copy it from the book or should I write NASA for a copy?
A: To obtain original reproduction quality copies requires ordering from NASA .
To my knowledge such continue to be public domain...
Q: Where are the Adamski's original negative photos today?
A: Locked up in our vault and archives
Q: Have the negative been investigated by experts after Adamski's death?
A: All those who have examined the photos and negatives have never question
their integrity. As you know, Sherwood did so with Kodak as well ... The principle for
telescopic photography is very simple, and with 1950s and 60s technology, the graying
effect of telescopic photos cannot be faked. AND of course, the motion picture footage
remains some of the best and most authentic in civilian hands ...... If you look on
our website you will find a copy of the Affidavit from the photo developer who
examined and printed the original negatives.
Q: What do you say to those who criticize Adamski's photos?
A: Sometimes people forget that if you want to thake a good photo of as an
example - the scoutship. Adamski had to take perhaps a dozen photos before he was
satisfied. And that is the reason why I can laugh at those who criticize Adamski's
photos. While some say the photos are to blurred, other say they are to sharp!
Of course, only the best photos are published in books and newspapers. The rest are in
Q: Are you going to publish all adamski's photo in the
A: More photos and articles will be published in the next
printing of "Beyond the flying saucer mystery" Hopefully it will be released in 2011.
Q: Are there UFO-photos by Adamski that has never been published?
Q: Do you plan to realease other material as well?
A: We are working with digitalizing and transfering George Adamski's 8 mm and
16 mm to DVD. When we are finish, we plan to take up the work with digitalizing around
50 soundtapes that involves lectures and private meetings and transfering them to CD.
And finally we plan to write an Adamski biography that are built on chapters written
by some of Adamski's co-worker. It is a really important project.
Q: Is the Adamski's correspondance still avaible? and if so where is it?
A: All in our archives, including the papers of CA Honey which were
donated to the Foundation after his death several years ago ...
Q:. What is your opinion about Adamski's teaching in Tibet? 1936?
A: This was due to Adamski's time spent at a special location there for six
years. This school was not of the type of Tibetan lamasery which people would
associate to with such a location today ...
Q: Was Adamski a member of the Theosophian Society?
A: No not to my knowledge and I would have to research further. Over the years
All kinds of groups sent Adamski memberships, etc, as he became known in hopes of
associating to his fame. For instance he got a membership from NICAP in the late 1950s
but he never cared for or gave much attention to such things. Adamski always felt it
was best to remain the individual and not be associated with any group or official
organization which would eventually compromise his ability to tell the truth ... And
that was his exact reasoning for turning down the UN seat from U Thant in Jan of 1965.
Q: Carol Honey claimed that he had meet the spacebrothers, what is your
opinon about it?
A: Originally Honey did met the brothers through
Adamski - several times for during those early years these contacts would be often
visiting Adamski on the property ... HOWEVER, Honey wanted more, especially a ride in
a flying saucer and Adamski told him that he did not make those decisions or
arrangements, only the space contacts decides who goes and who does not (This also was
the wish of Desmond Leslie, however disappointed, he did not go as far as Honey) ....
Honey was enraged and began to make Adamski all kinds of trouble, including trying to
steal his copyrights. So Adamski had to take a lawyer to get Honey to stop ... All
these original letters and records exist in our archives. Adamski disassociated
himself with both Honey and Zinstag by 1963, but both used George or many years after
GAs death in order to make a name for themselves and still denounce George with their
misinformation.... Most despicable.
Q: Do you believe that there are
living spacebrothers on the ground on every planet in our solarsytem? The
spacebrothers told Adamski that they were living on the Moon, Venus, Mars and Saturn?
Is this your opinion or do you believe they have bases throughtout the solar system?
A: They have interim bases on our Moon. They live on these planets,
with thriving societies, however, do the declining condition of our solar system, they
are in the process of transferring their populations to the next solar system ... but
this will take many centuries still ...
Q: Both Adamski and your Father
Fred Steckling was in contact with the spacebrothers.Does your mother Ingrid and you,
also have contact with the spacebrothers?
A: We were fortunate to have
met and interacted with the space contacts of Adamski during his times on the East
coast during the last two years of his life. My entire family have witnessed them then
and since have, on occasion, enjoyed the great privilege of their presence over the
decades which have followed. We do not arrange these interactions, for ONLY THEY
decide when, where and if - and such contacts are always with a specific purpose
..... NO ONE can truly claim they can dictate or summon the space people when they may
come or have contact ... for if they do, they are liars..... Lastly, Time is not an
issue for them, therefore, over the decades we have aged noticeable, but they appear
relatively the same as they did 40 years ago.
for the following three question is that I wanted to know how Glenn Steckling was
involved with George Adamski and particular what he did or did not see during the two
years he met George Adamski.
Carol A. Honey claimed that he,
together with others eyewitnessed saw George Adamski channeling Orthon, sometimes
1961. I wanted to know if George Adamski also channeled Orthon while he was together
with the Steckling family?
I asked the question about the models, because a
member of UFO-Sweden claimed that after George Adamski death. People found the models
of the space ships, that he used to photograph while taking his famous photos. When I
said: "Fine, can you show these photos of George Adamski's models, so I can decide
myself if these are identical to the photos taking by George Adamski?" - I was met
Q: You hung out with George Adamski 1963-1965?
A: Yes, we lived together with Adamski at the Rodeffer residence whenever
George was on the East Coast. I spent time with him while my parents and Madeline were
busy out arranging his lectures and events. He introduced me to several of his space
friends who came by the house to brief and interact with him. We witnessed a number of
space ships over the property during those years too. Plus thereafter.
Q: During that time? Did you see George Adamski channeling extraterrestrials?
A: Adamski never channeled E.Ts..... channeling is nonsense and he said
so many times.
Q: Did you see any models in George Adamski's possession
that resembled the bell-shaped saucer? or oblong motherships?
A: No, we
never witnessed any models of any sort. - only the real space ships.
The Rodeffer film
Bellshaped type Flying Saucer - It was filmed on February 28th in 1965 by
at US government official Madeline Rodeffer home, in a suburb of
Washington DC called Silver Springs, Maryland USA.
The video is ca 475KB MPG
Used with Permission of the Copyright holders (2010-10-21) -
G.A.F. International/Adamski Foundation
[email@example.com] P.O.1722 Vista, CA 92085 U.S.A.
Basically there has been much untruth perpetuated concerning the
Rodeffer film, which was really the Adamski film, since Madeleine did not film it, but
rather George did, which is common knowledge ....
George returned in Jan of
1965 from U Thant, who offered him a seat on the UN, which Adamski declined - for the
very reason that he believed that taking any official postion or title would restrict
his ability to maintain the truth.
Around the end of that month, a Military
official gave Adamski a piece of film (which they attempted to do from time to time to
see if they could trick him with fabricated and faked images) - the military hoping
that George was an old man and he would use it by mistake and be thus be exposed and
more easily ridiculed. However, George was no fool, and he and my father went through
that military film frame by frame, splicing out segments for analysis, and found it
all to be badly faked - showing it to all in the house and later burning it in the
fire place that same day.
The Rodeffer film came nearly a month later at the
end of Feburary, after nearly 6 months of preparation by Adamski and his space
contacts. In later testimony, Madeleine had the two films confused, as she later did
many facts - especially after GA died and her personal life and marriage began to
fail. (my mother and I sat with her for over a week, just 2 years before she passed
away recently and went day by day through the events to reawaken her memory and she
eventually conceded that she had confused and inaccurately related events in the years
to follow which damaged Adamski in many ways) ....
That has always been the
truth about that film .... George called us to the house within the hour of the film
being taken and a very long conversation ensued where to have it safely developed,
since there was great danger in those days of leaving such a type of film too long for
laboratories to notify the authorities. It was decided that night and my father
personally took that intact and complete film to Dynacolor in Rockville on a 24 hour
service and he picked it up the very same way the next day .... That following
evening, six of us, Nelson (Madeleine husband) Madeleine, George, my Father, Mother
and I viewed it for the first time and it was COMPLETE - exactly as they had witnessed
and filmed it - nothing faked, nothing substituted - with segments of the ship
directly overhead showing the revolving rings as it hovered just over the roof as it
moved off ..... PERIOD .... Only us six would know that portion ....
week, George flew to Rochester New York to see Bill Sherwood at Kodak to make copies
of the film. He called back to the house and told us the CIA was all over the place
and he had to guard the film closely .... When he returned, the only thing that was
different from the film was that he had removed the section with the saucer hovering
overhead detailing the revolving rings. He had been approached by his space contacts
and was told to return that portion because it detailed too much and they did not want
the military to deduce any further leaps on the technology ....
As you can see
from the intact original film frames we alone possess after all these years, the 3
dimensionality is apparent and was the crowning achievement of George's proof about
his contacts ... He was ecstatic to have taken that piece of film ...... (there were
even better ones in his briefcase)
Whatever nonsense told or composed in the
years since, I can only say they were NOT there and WE were .... And this account has
been told on the record by us exactly the same by my Father, Mother and eventually
later by myself since 1965, so there is nothing new or being invented thereafter here
As I stated earlier Adamski, spent his last birthday with us And also
recorded a tape instructing the coworkers how to act and procedure to continue after
his passing. Of those instructions he also told my father to make six copies from all
the originals which he did and distributed as instructed. Off the top of my head they
were designated for May, US, Madeleine, Hans, R. Caswell, and I do not recall the
last right now. (It might have been Dora Bauer - with whom I corresponded with for
many years untill her passing) Only two of those original 'copies' survive to my
knowledge - May's and ours - of which both are in our vaults now. The original
segments were returned to Alice Wells and those sections are in our vault as well.
Other than the first six copies which included most of what was in GAs briefcase.
Although the Silver Springs footage was included in the copies, the original Silver
Springs footage did not go to Alice after the funeral - but was given Madeleine until
she lost that in the early 1970's.
C. A. Honey - George Adamski's associate and ghostwriter.
Has made a deep study of the Adamski type sacuer in
Publication #205-C Are Adamski Type Saucers Physical or not Physical?
His conclusion are that they are very real indeed! Before C.A Honey become an
he was an UFO-investigator for the Government and for 25 years of his life he held a
On June 1, 1953, the United States Air Force held a
breifing on "flying saucer" activity before Air Force Reserve Officers at the
Veteran's Administrations Building. The report from that meeting states, quote,:
"Chop was shown photographs that Adamski had taken with his telescopic camera near
"Pev. Marley, cameraman for Cecil De Mille's 'Greatest Show On
Earth,' who had served as a photographer with the Enemy Interceptor Command in the
Second World War and who could identify Jap Zeros and other enemy planes at a glance,
testified that Adamski's pictures, if faked, were the cleverest he had ever seen,
rivaling a Houdini.
Marley pointed out the shadows on these saucers, and also
on the ground corresponded to such a remarkable degree that they could not be faked,
and that to fake such pictures would require costly equipment which Adamski,
obviously, does not possess and which, even then, could not assure such a result."
C. A Honey further writes in his excellent publication:
Adamski photos were analyzed by scientific laboratories of the military, the
government, and by private laboratories dealing with such photos. The conclusion in
every instance has been the same: No evidence exists which points to any fraud in
making the pictures.
DesLes (Desmond Leslie) asked George Adamski several
times, if he could follow with him on his claimed Space Trips, but he was never
allowed. But in 1958 C. A. Honey was allowed to meet "little people" together
with George Adamski.
Read C.A. Honey's
Publication #205-C Are Adamski Type Saucers Physical or not Physical? online!
If you see a spherical yellow light in the sky, it might not be a yellow
balloon with a light inside, it might be something else... I didn't know that before
Adamski type flying saucers seen by the military and civilian
people in Washington D. C. on
March 1965 according to News - Recorder
back to linkpage
read and sign my guestbook