Free Energy Transformers

Transformer

Transformer



ET Transformer (2024-10-11) Updated

Overunity in transformer flyback mode

Anomalous power efficiency of a transformer driven by tuned duty cycle pulses by O. Ide, L. Danczykb - 2012

Replication of the Ide transformer device by Horst Eckardt, Bernhard Foltz - December 2, 2016

Detailed measurements of Ide transformer devices by Horst Eckardt, Bernhard Foltz, Karlheinz Mayer - July 16, 2017

Pulse transformer operating principles

Xiaodong Liu, Qichang Liang, Yu Liang - A Novel Transformer with Compensating Coil

New MTECH INDUSTRIES RESEARCH CO LLC

Paul Raymond Jensen - The Unidirectional Transformer (UDT)

BiTT - Bi-Toroid Transformer by Thane C. Heins and MrDKONZEN

New Transformers and coils

Bi-toroid Transformer replication (over unity transformer) - André Coutier Transformer Video

Y. B. F. J. Groeneveld - Amplifying Transformer: US 1,702,771

Gennady Markov - Bi-Directional Current Transformer: CA 2,224,708

New No CEMF Transformer

Johnson, Bud T. J. - Electrical Generator - Solid State Configuration CA 2,357,550

Iyad Baghdane, Alexis Herrera - High efficiency power generation system and a method of operating same USP 10,770,937



Hi Simon,

Take a look at link: No CEMF Transformer and read the pages and try to follow his way of thinking. Is the output of the secondary Volts-Amperes-Reactive? and because it is a transformer it has a phaseshift between Volts and Ampere on the input also? Is it the reason for almost no input power from the wall?

Best Wishes, Hermes

http://gratisenergi.se/fetrans.htm

https://www.mooker.com/thread-126.html


Hi Hermes,

Seems they think counter-EMF is actually a thing. It's actually just a result of the magnetic flux in the coil changing, and if you change the flux through a coil you're going to get an induced voltage. Also happens anywhere there's a possible electrical circuit and a changing magnetic flux through that circuit, which is why there's eddy-current and eddy-current losses and heating.

If you wind a coil around the total width of a core, rather than on each leg, it doesn't give you no magnetic circuit, just means that part of the magnetic circuit is in the air instead of in the ferrite. The secondary coil around one leg will pick up the changes in magnetic flux through it from the primary, but the large air-gap means that the flux-change is reduced from what it would be, if it was all ferrite along the magnetic path.

Putting a signal on the secondary, the net flux through the primary will be somewhere near zero (some leakage outside the ferrite). Thus seems like this configuration will give you transfer of AC from primary to secondary, but not the other way. Seems you should be able to improve the coupling by adding a complete (non air-gapped) ferrite path for the primary. Looks like it might end up non-symmetrical, and if so there's a chance of something odd happening. However, I expect that careful measurements will show that it remains symmetrical as regards energy passed across in each direction.

Coils store energy in the magnetic field they produce, so there's a time-delay built-in as you put electrical energy in and it goes into the magnetic field. Time delay, when you're using AC, is seen as a phase-change, and the phase-change you see depends on the frequency you're using as well as the voltage and current applied to the coil. Other coils see a change in the flux through them and produce a voltage (that's your CEMF or back-EMF) and if they are allowed to produce a current from that then the energy from the field gets used to produce that power from the coil.

Thus you need to see the system as a set of coils or conductive paths with a common magnetic flux that they see, though each conductive path may see a different proportion of the flux. Put energy in in one place, and it goes into the magnetic flux and can be taken out at any circuit that interacts with that flux. The act of allowing current to flow in a circuit from the change of flux however takes energy out of that change, and as far as we've seen so far it's precisely symmetrical as regards the energy you can get out and the the magnetic energy stored. While that underlying symmetry holds, so does the energy conservation law.

So see http://gratisenergi.se/prjensen.htm and http://gratisenergi.se/compcoil.pdf and you'll see that this sort of thing has been tried before. Openly published, and if it worked then we'd be using it because someone else would have tried it and found that it worked. Might seem a bit of a bummer that this doesn't work, but that's the reality. It doesn't work, and unless you figure a way to break the underlying symmetry then it will continue to not work. If a coil (or other electrical circuit) passes current, then that will change the magnetic field it produces, and likewise if the magnetic field it sees changes then it will get an induced voltage and current. The magnetic field acts as a bank for the energy for all circuits that see that magnetic field. To get energy out in one place, you need to have put it in in another place. No overdraughts possible.

Best regards, Simon




back to linkpage
suggestion
read and sign my guestbook