- Hello Hermes,
- Sorry for the delayed reply. My
responses are below:
On Jun 1, 2022, at 5:07 PM,
Hermes Atar Trismegistus
wrote:
Hi Garret,
First of all, I want to congratulate you for your US
Patent 11,258,379
Quantum Noise Power Devices"
I have a few questions:
1) What are the
power density compared to the size of the Quantum Noise Power Devices?
- Our
better devices produce about 70 W/m^2 in a tiny area. However, we’re still discovering
more about how the devices work, and this may change.
2) Can it replace
Lithium batteries in smart(mobile) phones or replace the battery in Internet Of
- That’s our hope. But we still have a lot of development to do.
Things? and is it cheaper to manufactor it compare to Lithium batteries of the
same output power?
- It’s hard to tell. Since our devices use only very thin
metals and insulators, the materials cost should be very low. I believe it will be
possible to scale of the manufacturing.
3) What are the price compared to
Lithium batteries for the same size and output power?
- Too soon to tell.
4) Figure 12 in your patent show a device array. Does it mean that it can
be both parallel and series
- Yes, but we have not demonstrated that.
manufactored on the same chips?
- In principle, yes, but too soon to
tell.
P.S I saw on your Colorado university page
https://www.colorado.edu/ecee/garret-moddel
that you are interested in Zero
Point Energy
Maybe you have already seen my free energy linkpage at:
http://gratisenergi.se/free.htm
- Thanks for the link.
- Best wishes,
- Garret
Garret Moddel
Professor, Electrical, Computer, & Energy Engineering
University of Colorado, 425 UCB
Boulder, CO 80309-0425
https://www.colorado.edu/faculty/moddel/
Best Wishes, Hermes
P.S Cc: reply to Simon Derricutt, because he is very interested in converting
background heat to electricity and other Quantum devices like:
Frank M Becker & Ankur Bhatt - Thruster Device USPA 20200332780
The Swedish Teacher of Wisdom
Hermes Atar Trismegistus
http://gratisenergi.se/index.htm
Hermes Atar Trismegistus
Den svenska visdomsläraren
http://gratisenergi.se/index2.htm
Hi Simon,
70 watt/m^2 is close to Andrea Rossi's
100 watt E-Cat SKLep. But the difference is
Garret Moddel - Quantum Noise Power Devices doesn't have any input power. But Andrea
Rossi's 100 watt E-Cat SKLep doesn't work without a connection to the grid. Some years
ago I wrote on Andrea Rossi's blog that it is
very easy to construct a free energy generator if it is connected to grid. You use a
capacitor to phase shift input current from input voltage. In this way. The free
energy generator will consume only a few watt with a very high power gain. Just like
the E-Cat SKLep.
I suspect that the E-Cat SKLep is manufactored in just that
way and it might not be a true free energy generator.
I have an idea. There are
many claimed overunity hydrogen generators that can power a combustion engine and run
a car on water. As you know the electrolysers is less then 100% effective.
But
can you use a battery that powers an inverter that supply Alternating Current for the
electrolyser and that you can phaseshift and make the current reactive so there is a
current gain that you feed the electrolyser and make more hydrogen than usually?
There is much information on the internet and believe me, much desinformation.
One idea that I have come across is that you feed the electrolyser with frequency 2.45
Hz and it will create a tenfold supply of hydrogen gas, compared to other frequencies.
Best Wishes, Hermes
P.S I have made a question and answer page with
Garret Moddel at:
Garret Moddel - Quantum Noise Power Devices USP 11258379
Hi Hermes,
Looks like this works, but it's going to take a while to understand
it properly.
I'm not certain it isn't harvesting thermal power since they are
using pretty small device areas to test and the thermal mass of the device would show
a very small temperature difference at this power level. On the other hand it is
breaking a symmetry in having the Casimir cavity there, so could be effectively
violating CoE. Hard to tell until you get a large-enough array and get the data.
I'd expect Garret Moddel to be checking this sort of stuff and to publish results when
he's got them. There's not a lot of material actually needed here, and maybe he'll
find a way to stack devices to improve the effective power per m² of device as well as
checking the actual device temperature during power output. Good news either way for
producing power. Assume he's telling the truth as well as he knows it. Still, note
that Casimir cavities also affect the horizon (see
Mike McCulloch's QI) and thus
also affect momentum and accelerations - might not actually be zero-point energy he's
getting out but for some other reason. Maybe not immediately important if you're
getting the power out, but might affect how people approach trying to improve it.
As regards anything from Rossi, assume it's not producing energy until
it's in use providing power for real customers. How many times do you need to find out
he lied about all the previous devices before you suspect he's lying about this one
too?
Ditto for being able to produce more Hydrogen than theory expects from
an electrolyser. Tried many times, didn't work. Thing is that you actually produce H,
which then loses a bit of energy combining into H2. Some of the electrical losses can
be reduced by running hot, or by using felted electrodes so the meniscus gets
electrolysed, or electrolysing steam, but you won't get over 100% efficiency. No
symmetry being broken, thus conservation laws apply.
That's why I'm
enthusiastic about QI theory, and the
electric thrusters being produced and tested. Does break a symmetry, and thus can
violate CoM, and that in turn allows violation of CoE. Should be able to reach
kW levels, too. Thus
probably the best fairly-immediate option for "renewable" energy in the next decade or
less. Also something you can personally test if you want to.
Best regards,
Simon
back to linkpage
suggestion
read and sign my guestbook