Cosmic Ray Battery
As I know you suffer from dyslexia, please print this
e-mail and give it to Maria Helena Braga so she can read it for you. I read about you
and Maria Helena Braga work on glassbatteries at:
Have you and Maria Helena Braga ever thought of creating a battery that is
electric as a permanent magnet is magnetic? I mean a permanent electric battery?
Not those used in electret microphones, but a more powerful battery.
In late 1980's I for the first time came across Nikola Tesla technology and Arthur P.
Summera book Solar/Cosmic Radiant Energy and the Electrinium Battery The solid state,
high voltage battery that is electric, like the magnet is magnetic.
Of course it is not an easy task to create such battery. But you and you team
might stumble on it. I suggest you buy a piezoelectret and attach it to the
glassbattery and send positive halfwave rectified current throught the piezoelectret.
Measure the output current by having an oscilloscope probe over a currentshunt
connected to the glassbattery. Be careful and use only lowpower or you could shatter
the glass to pieces.
Try 42800 Hz. That is the ether frequency according to
Keely, John Ernst Worrell
Either you invent a battery that converts slow material decay to electricity
using the principles in Gustav LeBon both excellent books.
and John Moray book:
or you could find out like the electrinium battery how to rectify Cosmic Rays
by using combination of different materials. Then you have to study Nikola Tesla work
with radiant energy. I qoute Arthur H. Matthews:
"The lectures which Tesla
gave in London and in America between the years 1889 to 1894 contains all information
that is needed to construct virutally all devices patented by Tesla"
You might find more useful information at my free energy page:
Best Wishes, Hermes
P.S does the name Andrea Rossi mean anything to you? Well he is showing the
test of his E-Cat QX on november 24 around 12 pm Miami Time. The test will be streamed
but delayed for several hours at:
Andrea Rossi needs a good battery as an electric source for his E-Cat QX
You can produce a permanent magnet, but once you have
then it is conservative with energy. It will give out as much as you've put into it,
and no more. You can also produce an electret, which will hold a permanent electric
charge between its two faces, and that is also conservative with energy - you can't
get any more energy out of it than you put in.
Keely was a fraud, and after he
died the air-lines that drove his inventions were found. Of course some people still
think he had something that really worked, but it was a scam.
power-density in cosmic rays - if there was we'd be dead. It's relatively simple to
harvest that energy, but it would cost a lot more per kWh and be pretty large, too.
Rossi's QX device will not be proven to work - again that's a lot of smoke and
mirrors combined with bad measurements. It will no doubt get a lot of words written
about it, but in another year or two Rossi will drop it quietly and have something
totally different about to be mass produced. Look at the history of what he has
claimed over the years.
It really is time that you accepted that all those free
energy claims have never panned out. Energy is conserved. That doesn't however stop us
recycling the energy we already have, or achieving a practical perpetual motion
machine that converts environmental heat back into usable energy. What is important is
that there's not a lot of point in keeping on trying projects that failed to deliver
every time they've been built. If they'd worked, they would have been sold. We should
learn from the past, and not repeat old mistakes. That doesn't necessarily mean that
we won't make new mistakes or that a completely new idea will necessarily work, but it
does have a better chance of succeeding since we don't know it's wrong until it's been
John Goodenough's work is based on energy being conserved, and he's
doing new stuff with new ideas. Not a lot of point in trying to tell him to try things
he can see won't work.
Instead of looking back at claims that either have never
been shown to work or have been shown to not work, it's better to look at reality and
to develop new ideas. The various websites you refer to are repositories of stuff that
didn't work, so use them instead as a compendium of what not to do. In a practical
sense, even Free Energy isn't free because you need to build a device to harvest it.
Solar panels are a good example, since that is Free Energy by any reasonable
definition. The idea is to get energy more cheaply over the lifetime of the device
than it costs you to get it from the wall-socket. You also want something that doesn't
pollute. Whatever device you make needs to be cheap to make (not much time, not much
material) and to last long-enough that the cost per kWh over its lifetime is less than
around 5 cents/kWh. If it costs you $2000 and gives out a watt of Free Energy then
that's really very expensive.
Best regards, Simon
back to linkpage
read and sign my guestbook