Leedskalnin the Iron Man
Leedskalnin's Perpetual Motion Holder
Ed Leedskalnin's "Perpetual Motion Holder" (PMH)
Ed Leedskalnin Perpetual Motion Holder - Youtube Video
Edward Leedskalnin Perpetual Motion magnetic currents "change polarity" test 2 -
Youtube Video
Magnetic Current - pdf book
Mathematical Model of Edward Leedskalnin’s Perpetual Motion Holder - pdf article
What are the differences between iron and steel?
Steel vs. Iron: Differences Between These Two Metals
Difference Between Iron and Steel
Types of Steel and Difference between Steel, Iron and Metal
Ferromagnetic resonance
Ferroresonance Phenomena and Strategy
Cadick Ferroresonance
Cahier Ferroresonance
Ferromagnetism
Ferrite Materials
Ferrites and Ferromagnetics Free Energy Generation - Nikolay E. Zaev
Ferroresonance - Youtube video
What is Ferroresonance?- Youtube video
Questions and Answers about the invention of Ed Leedskalnin:
Q1) What makes Lenz Law applicable to the contemporary power generation?
A1) It is only now when I have realized the significance of my experimenting
with diamagnetism and its impact on the contemporary power production and the Lenz
Law. This experimenting reveals that diamagnetism is only a temporarily induced
property. Diamagnetism is caused by induction of circular (eddy) electric currents
within some materials, copper being one of them. As an external magnetic field
approaches copper (let copper stand in for any diamagnetic material), eddy currents
induced within copper create their own magnetic field, which always opposes the
polarity of the induction field. Therefore the copper is temporarily repulsed by the
approaching external magnetic field, disregards its polarity. This repulsion
eventually disappears as the eddy currents within cease to flow. Once the magnetic
field is being withdrawn from the copper, the diamagnetism reverses and now the copper
follows, or appears to be attracted by the external magnetic field. This is the
underlying principle behind the Lenz Law effect in copper coil assisted standard power
generation.
Q2) What underlying principle causes magnification of magnetic
field initiated by a coil under electric current? [As it is a known fact that a given
coil with an iron (ferromagnetic if you insist) core produces much stronger magnetic
field than the same coil without the iron core.
A2) Ferromagnetism is again
caused by induced eddy currents within the ferromagnetic material (let iron stand for
all ferromagnetic materials). The differences between diamagnetism and ferromagnetism
are as follows:
Iron material structure organizes itself under the influence of
an external magnetic field for the duration of that influence, as opposed to
diamagnetism.
Ferromagnetism is always attractive, as opposed to diamagnetism,
which is directionally alternating.
Iron has the capacity to grossly enhance
the density of the external magnetic field, as opposed to diamagnetism, which never
even matches the density of the external field. The ferromagnetic enhancement is
caused by domain restructuring. While diamagnetism only induces eddies in the existing
crystalline structure, ferromagnetism also changes the material structure by blocks
(domains).
Q3) Why did Ed Leedskalnin say: "I made more electricity with steel
than I ever made with copper"?
A3) Ed Leedskalnin has stated "I made more
electricity with steel, than I ever made with copper", because he has found out during
his experimentations that induction of steel wire coil by a magnetic field always
caused attractive force between the inducing field and the field of the induced coil,
as opposed to a copper coil. This means that a magnetic rotor finger approaching a
steel coil is attracted to that coil. As it retreats, it is again attracted to it.
This comes to a wash and there is no net back torque on the rotor except for friction.
Q4) What kind of electric generator did Ed Leedskalnin attempt to patent in
the US according to his own claim, a patent application which has never appeared on US
patent Office records?
A4) Following that, Ed Leedskalnin had built a generator
with steel wire windings, or more likely rewound an existing one securing for himself
his own source of free electric power. He lived happily ever after till the time when
his vanity got better of him and made him to apply for a patent on his invention. Only
that this is the big No-No explicitly spelled out in US Patent Office regulations. US
Patent Office will not issue a patent for anything, which is claimed to provide free
energy or, in their own language, a perpetual motion machine. Because Ed's was an over
unity device, Ed's patent application has never made it into the US patent office
records, never mind ever being granted.
Q5) What has really happened to Ed
Leedskalnin? This is the same man who lived alone in his majestic Coral Castle without
paying a penny to an electric utility company having no hydro hook up. Yet he had
electric power available on the premises without any known source. This man tried to
patent something with which electricity can be produced, a generator. This man has
disappeared one day leaving only a note on his door: "Gone to the hospital". He
allegedly dies two days later in the hospital of cancer. Not a single witness to his
last trip, no one claiming to have given him a ride. Did the man, who should have been
laid down on his death bed, really walk for miles to get to the hospital?
A5)
And, because someone got somehow hold of Ed's patent application and found out (or
knew) that the thing worked, Ed Leedskalnin had suddenly died "of cancer".
Source:
LEEDSKALNIN THE IRON MAN
Hi Simon,
I
have a hard time understanding how to circumvent Lenz's Law by using steel wire
instead of copper wire on an electromagnet as described in the text on the page:
http://gratisenergi.se/leedskalnin.htm
The idea only applies to electric
generators. But I am interested to know if the idea of steel wire instead of copper
wire can be used in the Clemente Figuera transformer? As an input power, I imagine 2
copper coils that create magnetic north and south poles and output power through a
steel coil that bypasses Lenz's Law. Will it work?
Best wishes, Hermes
Hi
Hermes,
Easy enough to wind coils using iron wire, so I suggest you try it.
However, I'll predict that you won't get free energy this way. It doesn't
bypass Lenz's law - to do that you need to use the limited speed of light, or to find
a way that will use less work to change the magnetic field than you can generate as a
result of that magnetic flux change. The only way I currently expect to work for that
second method is to use the Meissner effect and superconductors. There might be a way
using the dependence of permeability of ferrites on the mechanical stress applied to
them, but the test I did a while back implied that doesn't work in the way I tested
(single magnetic path). Might work if you switch the flux between two paths, but I
haven't tested that. I don't hold out much hope for that, but at some point I'll test
it.
For the first way, you may be able to use the somewhat slower speed of
light in ferrites (high permeability, but permittivity not much different from free
space) to reduce the distance you need to travel to get a 1/4 wave offset between
source and destination at frequencies you can attain. You may need to use multiples of
that distance to get into far-field, so may take a while to find a design that works
even if the idea is right.
For Iron, though the permeability is high, there's
no data for the permittivity I know of, so the speed of light within Iron probably
isn't known, and in any case light doesn't travel well anyway because of the
electrons. The EM wave as such is outside the Iron, but the magnetic wave internally
must have a speed of propagation. May be possible to set up something to measure it,
though, but you would need an insertion coil and a couple of pickup coils at known
distances along the Iron, given that the rise-time of the input coil wouldn't be that
certain enough to time from the input signal. Of course, if you wind a coil of Iron
wire, the magnetic wave would travel across the wires rather than through them, so the
delay would be a lot smaller.
It's almost certain that those historical claims
of Free Energy were lies, given the number of people who have tried to replicate them.
If you want to succeed, it follows that you need to do something that's significantly
different. To achieve that, you need to think about what's actually happening, and
find some sneaky way around what normally happens by exploiting some other property.
It is of course also possible that the descriptions left out something
critical because the inventor didn't realise it and accidentally got things right.
Maybe a particular source of materials, or getting some dimensions exactly right by
chance. Maybe one device worked, but replications (even by the inventor) didn't.
That's a pretty unlikely chance, but possible (it applies to LENR experiments often).
Unless you can figure out why it could have worked, though, you can't design one with
exactly the right materials and forms that will work. My bet, though, is that almost
all the claims were lies or measurement errors. Too many people have tried to
replicate them (and failed) to give any confidence that the claims were at all true.
Best regards, Simon
back to linkpage
suggestion
read and sign my guestbook
