William Alek, Intalek Inc, Research and Patents
Intalek Library
William Alek Academia papers
William Alek Energy Management System USP 9,620,280B2
How to Build Solid-State Electrical Over-Unity Devices by William Alek, Intalek, Inc.
The Split Flux Transformer SFT V1.0
The Split Flux Transformer SFT V2
Youtube Videos:
William Alek, Revealing Secrets of FREE Energy/Overunity
William Alek - A Spark Gap Method of Harnessing Radiant Energy
Bill Alek - The Physics of FREE Energy/Overunity Transformers
William Alek - Free Energy and Anti-Gravity
Konstantin Meyl Scalar Wave Interview with William Alek
William Alek: Amazing Future Technology & Radical New View On Physics/Metaphysics
AuroraTek demonstion tesla tech 2014 overunity? (Russ's View)
AuroraTek Demonstrates Overunity Transformer at TeslaTech 2017
Hi Simon,
What do you think about William Alek's free
energy generators?
http://gratisenergi.se/alek.htm
The description is available at
http://gratisenergi.se/alek.pdf
Note that the copyright is from 2002 and pages 18-29 describe different versions of
free energy generators. It seems he uses an electromagnet powered from a first battery
as a motor and charges a second battery through the collapsed electromagnet energy
(back electromotive force).
http://gratisenergi.se/alek9620280.pdf
The 2017 patent manufactures
reactive energy at the input of the energy amplifier and he gets real energy out the
output of the energy amplifier. Many claim that you can make a free energy generator
by using reactive energy at the input by phase shifting voltage and current so that
the actual input energy is 0 watts.
But it only works on mains-connected free
energy generators and not on battery-powered energy amplifiers?
Best Wishes,
Hermes
Hi Hermes,
Come on, you should have realised that this
isn't really producing energy, since otherwise he'd own the world by now.
Where
is there a broken symmetry here? Where people talk about reactive energy, and
converting it to real energy, that's a problem of bad measurement because they are
measuring the (average) amps and multiplying it by the (average) amps and saying
that's the power. It isn't. The actual power is the integral of the instantaneous
volts times amps over a second, and this applies no matter what the phase difference
is. When the phase of the volts and amps is the same, the two methods give the same
answer as long as your meters give an RMS result, but the actual energy per second is
only correctly measured instant by instant and then summing, with accuracy improving
the higher the rate of measurements.
Madness is doing the same thing and
expecting a different result....
Best regards, Simon
back to linkpage
suggestion
read and sign my guestbook