Robert Adams pulsed motor/generator
The Adams Pulsed Motor Generator Manual
Simple Adams Motor Concepts (Hoptoad)
Robert Adams Pulsed Electric Motor Generator: Theory & Tips
The Adams Active Thermo Electric High Voltage Pulsed DC Permanent Magnet Switched
Reluctance Electric Motor
Faraday Research RND -- Adam's motor generator secrets exposed!!
Faraday Research RND -- Adams motor generator build secrets
Completion and operational testing of the Adams' permanent magnet electric D.C.
motor-generator
Hi Hermes
I just did a video last night. Put my motor
on the scope so you can kind of see what kind of waveform I'm getting and you can see
the values that I'm using to run the motor. So check it out and let me know what you
think.
Thanks! Mike
Hi Mike,
I always believed that the
secret of Adams Motor/Generator was in the output coil.
In the video
Faraday Research RND -- Adam's
motor generator secrets exposed!!
There are two coils, but in the video
Faraday Research RND -- Adams motor generator build secrets
There is only one coil: Do you use that only coil both as motor and a generator coil?
how much voltage can the Piezo withstand? What are they made of and where do
you buy them?
It might be possible to make a solid state version like the
MRA = Magnetic Resonance Amplifier.
Sorry for not repling earlier, but I am fighting the Corona infection and have
been sick since monday.
38.5C fever and coughs up mucus, and only a few times
with blood.
Best Wishes, Hermes
Hi Hermes, I hope you're getting
better. Sounds like you got covid pretty bad.
Anyways, yeah the piezos can
handle 30 volts but I've been pumping 160 and they're not blowing up???? which I find
pretty interesting as well...
the second coil is just an add-on to see if I can
just tap off the magnetic wheel spinning and generates some extra AC current which
eventually can be pumped back into the system again. I plan to get four coils going
around and one drive coil.
I'm hoping to get another 12 volts DC just from
those coils around the wheel and that I can tap back into the input of the motor
generator.
Right now the motor is only experiencing about 10% or less lenz law
...so I can almost stop the wheel and the current does not increase more than 10
milliamps ...
When I get a tune just right it will only consumes 40 milliamps
maximum to run the system...
I have some other ideas that I want to try out in
the near future so stay tuned to some of my videos to see what I do.
Thanks,
get well soon.
Mike
Hi Garret and Simon,
Thank you for
your late reply. I have a question. Has there been any pressure from energy companies
to disband energy research in some areas of interest? I write this question, because
I have heard that there is an energy conspiracy in the world.
I recently found
out about the work of the frenchman Rene-Louise Vallee and his synergetic theory.
http://gratisenergi.se/vallee.htm
I wrote an e-mail to leadcool reactor
inventor Janne Wallenius
http://www.leadcold.com/index.html
and suggested that he should repeat the
experiment done by Eric d'Hoker who might be the same at:
https://www.pa.ucla.edu/faculty-websites/dhoker.html
I haven't received any reply from Janne and I know that his leadcold prototype is
under financed with 125.000.000 SEK = 13.000.000 USD so his busy collecting money, but
I told him that if he doesn't get the money, he should construct d'Hoker the device to
find out if there is any truth in the reported claims. I have also written an e-mail
to Eric d'Hoker and asked for more information about his graphite device. But got no
reply. So I ask you to consider to replicate the Eric d'Hoker device just to see if it
has any value. It is a graphite device that emits beta radiation so you must build it
inside a leadbox.
I also have book suggestion:
https://books.google.se/books?id=qUV8BwAAQBAJ&pg=PA89&lpg=PA89&dq=rene-louis+vallee+the+universe+of+maxwell&source=bl&ots=ua6eA5f3Oo&sig=ACfU3U2dOSzq0uQcAydzBi6dq1Mn-MXtDQ&hl=sv&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjpyZbM_cj7AhXDSfEDHbKaAC4Q6AF6BAgkEAM#v=onepage&q=rene-louis%20vallee%20the%20universe%20of%20maxwell&f=false
It is written by the french ether theorist Bernard Piette that challange
quantum physics and more. It was originally written in french. So Simon you could lend
it from a french library.
Simon, what do you think of this easy to replicate
device?
http://gratisenergi.se/adams.htm
The coil is pulsedriven and I wonder if the amperemeter is telling a lie because the
device draws spike electricity and the only visible output is 6 5watt ledlamps and you
know that Ledlamps can light up with litttle current. But the difference with 4 piezos
is interesting. Maybe Mike has found something of interest.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ihpdKnbqFQ0
Best Wishes, Hermes
Well I am almost cured from corona. Still a little fever and chough up mucus.
Hi Hermes,
That synergetic idea (Rene-Louise Vallee) was
published in 1974-5, and the test-bed you showed is from 2008. Thus looks like it
doesn't actually work, since the claims for 4 times energy out than in would be
pretty easy to confirm and it's not complex to make.
Yep, the Leadcool idea
looks good. Being able to burn the "waste" from other reactors means the fuel is
really negative cost. Like most fission reactors, there's no doubt it can work OK, and
the problem is whether it gets enough finance to start with and what it costs to build
in mass-production. The main cost of fission systems will actually be the planning
permissions and permits, giving a long delay from being technically possible to being
built and running, and also putting up the costs of building by around an order of
magnitude.
Looks like D'Hoker has moved on from synergetics and is really
working on string and brane theory at the moment. Thus may not reply. The proposed way
this worked was that Carbon-12 changed to Boron-12, freeing an electron which gave the
current, but this would also give a change in binding energy and given the number of
electrons said to be produced would either need a lot of energy putting in or would
deliver a lot of heat energy in the process (I haven't looked up the nuclear energy
difference here yet). On the face of it, looks like it won't work since it's pretty
hard to get a change in the nucleus from messing around with the electron orbitals.
Net thing there is that it's extremely unlikely it worked for real, and that any
excess power measured was experimental error.
For the Adams motor, looks to me
to be a standard pulse-motor. Though these can give the impression of producing energy
if you use it to pulse-charge a Lead-acid battery, in reality that's a battery effect.
Main thing here, though, is that there is no broken symmetry and thus no chance of
violating CoE.
Important thing here - show me what symmetries are being broken
and why that leads to a violation of CoE. If you can't see that, you're wasting
your time on the experiments because you won't violate CoE. Nearly always, when
dealing with magnetic fields, there will be a perfect symmetry in the energy you need
to put in to change the field and the energy that change of field can generate. I only
know one situation where that doesn't apply, and that involves superconductors and
using a laser of the right frequency to just split the Cooper pairs and thus disable
superconductivity and the Meissner effect. There may be other such situations we
haven't yet found, but if you look at the design and can't see where that normal
symmetry is being broken, it will obey CoE.
Thus the first question to ask is
"what symmetry are we breaking here?". The finite speed of light, which gives a
time-delay between the cause and the effect, can break symmetries, but given that that
the speed of light is pretty fast then that means we won't see much of an effect at
low frequencies anyway - we need to get up to microwave frequencies in order to get a
1/4 wavelength in most normal-sized electromagnetic builds, and then there's a problem
with the inductance of the coil at that frequency which reduces the amount of power
you can put in or get out as a force. Thus at the 50Hz or a few kHz people tend
to use, the wavelength is too long and the time-delay from transmission is too small
relative to the period to see any large effects. Even at MHz frequencies the
wavelength is too long unless you build something huge.
With a few exceptions,
the historical accounts of Free Energy tell you how not to succeed, since they didn't
succeed (and if they had succeeded they'd have got a lot of money and we'd be using
that invention now). Also, for most of them, many people have also tried them and
failed. Unless you figure out what did happen, and what you need to happen to break a
relevant symmetry, and how you make that happen (so you will need to change the design
significantly), any replications will also fail.
Best regards, Simon
Hi Simon,
http://gratisenergi.se/adams.htm
Click on the link with the "new" sign or
use the link below.
I found this document on a free energy site and copied it,
before it disappeared:
http://gratisenergi.se/adamsmg.pdf
read:
Page 8 : Pick-up Coils and
Bending Lenz's Law ………………………...Page 36
Page 10 : An Experiment in Bending
"Lenz's Law “……………………… Page 47
Does he got something? or is the whole paper
disinformation and that is the reason why it disappeared?
Best Wishes, Hermes
Hi Hermes,
Slight misstatement at "There has never been an
analogue meter built, which can measure AC current directly, so we'll have to assume
that the meter has it's own inbuilt full wave bridge to convert the current to DC."
since early meters used the attraction of a bit of iron to a coil, so worked with AC
and DC. Look up "
moving-iron meter".
In short,these experiments are looking at reductions in
inefficiency and thinking those show overunity. Bit like Thane Heins in that way.
If this was actually overunity, you'd be able to put a capacitor on the output
power and use it to run the motor, with some left over to run something else, even if
that was only a LED. Start it running, and it would keep running. If you need a
battery, and that battery runs down, it should be pretty obvious that, no matter what
the meters say, it's not OU.
The whole point about this search for Free Energy
is that you actually want excess energy to come out from whatever device you're
messing around with. Unless you find a significant error and correct it, if someone
else's implementation of a principle doesn't work, your replication of it won't work,
either. If they show a gain on the meters, and yet it won't run itself, then it
doesn't really work and you're being fooled by the meters (wrong meters, badly placed,
or misinterpreted).
Best regards, Simon
back to linkpage
suggestion
read and sign my guestbook