Cold Electricity
The Free Energy Secret of Cold Electricity by Peter Lindemann
John Bedini's Cold Electricity
The Cold Electricity Coil of ‘UFO politics’
Using back EMF to charge a capacitor
Cold Electricity - Tibor Kemeny
Hi Simon,
What is your opinion about cold electricity?
http://gratisenergi.se/cold.htm
and UFOpolitics circuits?
http://gratisenergi.se/cold.pdf
Isn't a special version of a back emf
circuit?
https://forum.allaboutcircuits.com/threads/using-back-emf-to-charge-a-capacitor.188884/
UFOpolitics claim that by putting a low ohm load. Cold electricity flows in to
supply the load in a overunity way. But is it possible to have more energy going out
from the coil, then used to charge the coils magnetic field?
And what about the
cold electricity coil in figure 2. It is simply a transformer and must load the
transistor in a bad way. I don't understand how it could supply cold electricty when
the transistor is "on". I do understand it when the transistor is "off"
Best Wishes, Hermes
Hi Hermes,
Measuring spiky currents and
voltages is always harder, and if you're charging a battery then pulse charging with
high currents/voltages produces what is called "surface charge" on the plates, where
the bulk of the material isn't charged but a bit on the surface is, so you get a high
terminal voltage (a battery tester tells you it's charged) but if you connect a load
to it it discharges very quickly. You haven't got the amp-hours stored that the
battery tester says.
Notice there is no good definition of cold and hot
electricity. Looks to me that what they are calling "cold" is spikes of high voltage.
This subject has had a lot of people experimenting. None of them have made a
system that runs itself and a load without the battery running out at some point. Thus
the whole effect is based on not getting the energy measurements right.
There
really isn't much point in having the meters show you it's OU if it won't actually run
itself and a load without running down and stopping once the battery is exhausted.
Best way to look at this is that it isn't a good path to real OU. Worse, it
diverts people from experimenting with stuff that might actually work if they figured
out how to break an essential symmetry. With a coil, you're storing input energy in
the magnetic field, and that's the total energy you can get out again when that field
collapses - it's symmetrical that way. In general, I don't see a collection of magnets
and coils being able to break that symmetry, either.
What you need to do is to
either produce a larger magnetic field than a current would normally do, or to produce
a change in flux that is greater than the amount of energy you need to put in to
change the flux that much. You can't do that using switches and coils (forget the
transistors - they're simply used as switches here that lose a bit more energy than a
simple switch). The only way I know to do that is using a superconductor that can be
switched between normal and superconducting using a smaller energy input than the
flux-change can deliver. Might be other ways, but looks like you will need to use
quantum physics, as in the superconductor, where you're enabling/disabling the Pauli
Exclusion Principle. Classical physics alone won't hack it.
Best regards,
Simon
back to linkpage
suggestion
read and sign my guestbook