Cold Electricity



Cold Electricity

The Free Energy Secret of Cold Electricity by Peter Lindemann

John Bedini's Cold Electricity

The Cold Electricity Coil of ‘UFO politics’

Using back EMF to charge a capacitor

Cold Electricity - Tibor Kemeny




Hi Simon,

What is your opinion about cold electricity?

http://gratisenergi.se/cold.htm

and UFOpolitics circuits?

http://gratisenergi.se/cold.pdf

Isn't a special version of a back emf circuit?

https://forum.allaboutcircuits.com/threads/using-back-emf-to-charge-a-capacitor.188884/

UFOpolitics claim that by putting a low ohm load. Cold electricity flows in to supply the load in a overunity way. But is it possible to have more energy going out from the coil, then used to charge the coils magnetic field?

And what about the cold electricity coil in figure 2. It is simply a transformer and must load the transistor in a bad way. I don't understand how it could supply cold electricty when the transistor is "on". I do understand it when the transistor is "off"

Best Wishes, Hermes



Hi Hermes,

Measuring spiky currents and voltages is always harder, and if you're charging a battery then pulse charging with high currents/voltages produces what is called "surface charge" on the plates, where the bulk of the material isn't charged but a bit on the surface is, so you get a high terminal voltage (a battery tester tells you it's charged) but if you connect a load to it it discharges very quickly. You haven't got the amp-hours stored that the battery tester says.

Notice there is no good definition of cold and hot electricity. Looks to me that what they are calling "cold" is spikes of high voltage.

This subject has had a lot of people experimenting. None of them have made a system that runs itself and a load without the battery running out at some point. Thus the whole effect is based on not getting the energy measurements right.

There really isn't much point in having the meters show you it's OU if it won't actually run itself and a load without running down and stopping once the battery is exhausted.

Best way to look at this is that it isn't a good path to real OU. Worse, it diverts people from experimenting with stuff that might actually work if they figured out how to break an essential symmetry. With a coil, you're storing input energy in the magnetic field, and that's the total energy you can get out again when that field collapses - it's symmetrical that way. In general, I don't see a collection of magnets and coils being able to break that symmetry, either.

What you need to do is to either produce a larger magnetic field than a current would normally do, or to produce a change in flux that is greater than the amount of energy you need to put in to change the flux that much. You can't do that using switches and coils (forget the transistors - they're simply used as switches here that lose a bit more energy than a simple switch). The only way I know to do that is using a superconductor that can be switched between normal and superconducting using a smaller energy input than the flux-change can deliver. Might be other ways, but looks like you will need to use quantum physics, as in the superconductor, where you're enabling/disabling the Pauli Exclusion Principle. Classical physics alone won't hack it.

Best regards, Simon





back to linkpage
suggestion
read and sign my guestbook