Experiments With a Kromrey & a
Brandt-Tesla Converter Built By John Bedini
Nikola Tesla’s 4-Battery Switch
GB191417811A System for Generation of Electric Currents
GB191505591A System for Generation of Electric Currents
GB191514311A System for Generation of Electric Currents
GB121561A New process System for Generation of Electric Currents
The Bedini Tesla Switch - 2 DVD set
The Self-Recharging Battery Supply Of Carlos F. Benitez
Norman Wootan: Tesla Switch. I got to know Tom Bearden back in 1987 who
told me about JB. I called and talked to JB and ordered plans for the Tesla Switch.
Built several versions and even designed my own battery switching methods. End result
was overall system could not maintain charge of batteries and deliverer power to a
load. Sorry!
Hi Simon,
How is your life in these corona times? Any good news in
building free energy generators?
I have been experimenting with a Megahertz
frequency generator as a battery charger:
http://gratisenergi.se/recharge.htm
It works as a battery charger but it is too slow rising 0.5 volt to 6 volt in
6 hours. It is too slow to have any practical use. I have been thinking on building a
Tesla Switch:
http://gratisenergi.se/benitez.htm
There are several bids of how often the switching should be:
John Bedini and the electrodyne corporation: 100-800 Hz
Rick Frederich: 1-2
seconds
Peter Lindemann: 1 hour
Why can't they agree on one switching
frequency? Is it because as Norman Wootan wrote: The Tesla Switch does not work and
that is the reason why they don't sell it as a kit on the market. It is not good news
that John Bedini told lies. What else did he lied about and the same is about Bearden
The Motionless Electromagnetic Generator (MEG)
http://cheniere.org/megstatus.htm
In the free energy circus there are always "experts" who makes the free energy
generators working, But when ordinary people order plans and parts. Assamble them and
test them. They don't work.
This is bad science.
Best Wishes, Hermes
Hi Hermes,
Not a lot of difference here because of the virus. Just a
bit less time shopping each week. It's worthwhile getting some Ivermectin in case you
find you have symptoms, or if you can't get that then buy in a stock of Tonic Water
(with real Quinine) and drink it to slow the virus replicating long enough for your
immune system to kill the virus.
Seems you've finally realised that a lot of
the Free Energy claims were lies or bad measurements. I've covered the Battery Effect
before - pulse charge and discharge can give you more energy out than you think you
put in, but it's stored chemical energy that does run out. Useful for de-sulphating
batteries anyway, and you might be able to restore a battery using it.
There
are some real Free Energy devices you can build, though. Look up the
Lovell Monotherm or
Robert Murray-Smith's replications of it. That at least is good science, and easy
to do. The stuff
Mike McCulloch is working on is however maybe a bit beyond your capabilities
there.
Happy New Year!
Best regards, Simon
Hermes,
As to
your question about batteries. YES, pulse charging batteries is the way to go. After
14 years of working with the "3 Battery System" and the "Tesla Switch" (Benitez setup)
I have found that lead acid batteries can be charged at very high voltages with ALMOST
NO AMPERAGE and it causes you no problems at all. Lead acid batteries do NOT LIKE
AMPERAGE. It will eventually ruin them, as you have described.
Lithium
batteries are the OPPOSITE. They will handle higher amperage but not a whole lot more
than the charging voltage. So on a Tesla switch setup, how do you supply the bottom
batteries with the correct voltage with little amperage. Capacitors in parallel with
the batteries are the best way, connected to the batteries by diodes.
Zener
diodes that dump to the batteries at LOW amperage but high voltage no matter WHAT the
input is. Caps that will handle high voltage but contain LITTLE amperage. Solves all
the issues you have concerns about. They will fill up to a high voltage with very
little amperage and then dump to the battery through a Zener diode at the voltage you
have selected.
BUT, BUT, BUT, BUT To be CLEAR, it is NOT ABOUT "charging
batteries." If that is your focus, you will never see the things I have seen. It is
all about the LOAD you run between the positives. The load is ABSOLUTELY the key to
success. There are losses in ANY electrical system.
Your load must allow you to
recover MOST of the energy that goes THROUGH it, while producing energy OF ITS OWN.
That load must be capable of running on a DC pulse. It must contain a coil that will
collapse, giving you an output spike that helps make up for the system losses. Those
are the minimums. There are a number of different loads I have tried:
Pulse
Motors, Inverters, Boost Modules, Buck Modules, DC to DC converters, to name a few.
With ALL of them, you use two battery banks. One group of batteries is in
series to give you high voltage. The other bank is in parallel to give you low voltage
and receive the charge. You can connect the high voltage bank Positive IN to the + IN
on the device and the low voltage bank Positive IN to the device - IN, and it will
run. In all cases you get an output from the secondary. Mechanical output from the
pulse motor and voltage output from all the others. Some are more efficient than the
others. Once you understand how it all works and can take extra energy back to the
top, you can REPLACE all batteries with capacitors.
Have I listed the BEST
device to run on the positives? NO. I said you need to run the device on a PULSE. NONE
of these run on a pulse. Benitez shows us what the best device is. AND, he understood
that you can get the same amount of energy to produce 30-70 times as many amps output
as input at the SAME VOLTAGE by using a spark gap. Look at his later patents where he
uses both an interrupter and a spark gap. This gives you both pulses (which gives you
recovery) and multiple amps from the spark gap which brings in energy from OUTSIDE
the system.
Put 100 watts THROUGH the circuit and recover 80 watts. GENERATE
80-90 watts. More out than in? Absolutely! And this is WITHOUT the spark gap that
increases the amperage output.
LOAD:
HIGH efficiency
Must work with
pulsed DC
Must contain a coil that will collapse.
Must output energy separate
from what is input, but in direct relation to the input.
Add a spark gap to this
circuit.
Benitez Patent 121561
https://potentialtec.com/121561.pdf
- Anonymous
Hi Simon,
What
do you think about anonymous ideas for free energy? Will it work? I found more
information at:
Providing information,
direction and actual Free Energy Overunity Systems for people in need.
Best
Wishes, Hermes
Hi Hermes,
It'll work to some extent and for a limited time. I'm not sure precisely what it does
to the batteries, but people who have made this work say you get more energy out for a
while until the battery totally dies so it's something to do with the chemistry. Works
better if your battery is a bit sulphated up (old battery). However, batteries are
expensive to replace, so that extra energy will not be cheap.
It's the basic
principle behind
Magnacoaster, and you can
look that up. David Bowling also did a series of tests on this about 10 years ago,
but again found that the "free energy" was only for a time, and then the battery
stopped working. He used a DC motor with a sparky commutator to get his spikes. Just
file the brushes a bit narrower, to stop them overlapping the commutator segments.
Yep, wears the commutator somewhat fast with the sparks, but gets the result.
Overall, not really worth it. Costs too much.
Best regards, Simon
back to linkpage
suggestion
read and sign my guestbook