Charles J. Flynn Parallel Path Magnetic Technology



Parallel Path

Parallel Path Magnetic Technology for High Efficiency Power Generators and Motor Drives

Flynn Research Inc - Defining the Motors and Generators of Tomorrow

Parallel Path Overunity device

Making a Flynn Motor

Charles J. Flynn - Methods for Controlling the Path of Magnetic Flux from a Permanent Magnet and Devices Incorporating the same - US 6,246,561 - 2001

Charles J. Flynn - Methods for Controlling the Path of Magnetic Flux from a Permanent Magnet and Devices Incorporating the same - US 6,342,746 - 2002

Patents by Inventor Charles J. Flynn



Hi Simon,

I have written to you before about QM Power: https://qmpower.com but they seems to be offline. Either because they have been threatened or because they have gone bankrupt?

Now my simple question if you look at the image at: http://gratisenergi.se/flynn.htm

Is it possible to make a overunity transformer by winding a coil over the lifted leg at: 3845 grams Parallel Path ? You might say as it is not on the market. It will not work?

But I found two links to the guy Swagatam who has built Parallal Path Magnetic Technology: https://www.homemade-circuits.com/can-parallel-path-magnetic-technology/

https://www.homemade-circuits.com/making-flynn-motor-circuit-diagram/

Best Wishes, Hermes

P.S I understand that the magnets provide more magnetism, but do they cause more current to flow through an imaginary secondary coil? Doesn't the rule with the number of turns in the primary and secondary coil apply to the transformer?


Hi Hermes,

I don't recall discussions on this. Still, on the 2nd "home-made circuits" site, you get this comment:

"Hans Braun says

May 14, 2025 at 7:16 am

The 4X pulling force you note is only in a static design. In a “motor” design the gap eliminates the 4X gain. It is extremely efficient but not over-unity."

As usual here, with coils and magnets and a frequency/edge rate that isn't cutting-edge fast, there's no breaking symmetry, and as I keep telling you that's the really important thing to consider here. Fairly obviously, the guy running the website didn't get it running OU either, but was telling people how it was made and how it was supposed to work.

If you put a high-coercivity permanent magnet in parallel with a soft-Iron low-coercivity bar, and a coil around it, you can magnetise the soft-Iron bar with the same direction or opposite direction as the permanent magnet, and thus have a permanent magnet you can switch on or off with a pulse of current through the coil in the right direction. Yep, needs a bit of care in sizes to get the assembly to be near-zero magnetic field when switched off, but you can get there by experiment. A friend Mark Brasche) thought that that could make an OU motor - you don't need to run the current all the time, just pulses. Turns out the energy need to flip the assembly is equal (plus a bit) to the energy you can get from that flip. Great for supplying a strong torque at low rpm, without needing a constant current, but not OU.

As regards the transformer part idea here, you get current out of the secondary depending on the rate of change of magnetic field in the core from the rate of change of current in the primary. Thus if the flux really is x4 the output from a coil wound around the end-pieces ought to be x4 too. You'd need to try this to be certain, but I'd expect the current drawn in the magnetising coils would rise, and you'd need to measure the inductance by the rate of rise of current at a specific voltage. Thus though it looks like you should be able to get extra power (4x input power) by winding a coil around each end-piece, and you probably would in fact get a high output from those coils, seems unlikely you'd end up with OU because again it remains symmetrical. It's really hard to break symmetry with magnets and coils, since the only available break is because of the limited speed of light and thus a small delay between changing the field at one place and it changing at some distance away. It's a very small delay though - very hard to exploit, and even harder to exploit it with a useful amount of power.

Note that winding coils on those two end-pieces is a very obvious thing to do given the demonstrable increased holding-force and thus flux. Many people will have tried that when they come across that arrangement. Thus, again, if you don't see it being used to generate power, it won't actually generate power.

If you give magnetic flux two equal paths, it tends to divide unequally, and can be flipped between the two paths and normally is stable in each flux arrangement. A useful thing to know, but doesn't lead to OU unless you add in something that itself doesn't conserve energy (such as the symmetry-break of adding two Fermions together to get a Boson, where the energy levels of each type are totally unconnected).

Best regards, Simon




back to linkpage
suggestion
read and sign my guestbook